Memespace Names and URNs

If levitra prescription a drug requires prior authorization but you start treatment without discount aldactone the prior approval, you could pay the full cost of buy cheap tetracycline online the medication. WHY ARE COSTS DIFFERENT FOR BRAND-NAME DRUGS VS. clindamycin gel sale GENERIC DRUGS?Brand-name drugs can be expensive because of the research buy no rx needed to test their safety and effectiveness. However, if you buy cheap quinine have health insurance, you'll need to talk with your insurance buy cialis from india provider to learn the actual cost you would pay for buy cephalexin online cheap Nexplanon. The absence of warnings or other information for a buy viagra on internet given drug does not indicate that the drug or drug tablet certified combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or buy discount ampicillin online all specific uses. Talk with your doctor if you're concerned about.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.