Memespace Names and URNs

However, order generic diovan eczema may indicate that a person's immune system is sensitive zoloft for order or over-reactive to certain irritants, so there may be dysregulation pyrantel pamoate rather than weakness. While an overactive or dysregulated immune system buy cheap viagra internet contributes to the development of eczema, it does not cause buy cheap flovent online the body to attack skin cells. Eczema patients tend to cheap bangkok have more colonization with Staph aureus, making them more susceptible buy clindamycin gel online to bacterial infections like impetigo. Depending on the device type, cheap cipro pill a healthcare professional directs light at the affected skin areas, buy cheap glucophage usually for a few seconds to minutes. Some individuals experience lasix significant relief from their symptoms, including reduced itching, redness or bentyl for order discoloration, and inflammation. The length of laser treatment for eczema can.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.