Memespace Names and URNs

Research purchase cheapest cialis price tablet suggests that having low blood pressure increases a person's risk t-ject 60 no prescription of having a stroke or TIA and of dying from cheap cialis overnight delivery stroke. In other cases, people can experience symptoms early on, discount order side effects usa but this depends on a person's circumstances. In many places, buy generic asacol there are also differences in the way that doctors treat order atarax overnight delivery heart disease based on sex or gender. People should contact generic clomid a doctor right away if they are concerned they have find no rx viagra symptoms of heart disease. Physical therapy and rehabilitation programs can robaxin prescription help people regain strength in the affected muscles and relearn buy cialis in us movement patterns. Other causes of facial drooping include Bell's palsy, trauma,.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.