Memespace Names and URNs

The buy cheapest for absence of warnings or other information for a given drug buy t-ject 60 does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is generic cheapest online safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific viagra online without prescription uses. Medication will not cure a person's allergy but can sale buy get help them manage the allergic reaction symptoms that can affect bentyl online stores the whole respiratory tract. People may also find it beneficial generic colchicine to work with an allergist who can help them identify lowest price for online which allergens trigger their nasal allergies and asthma. These may generic lasix online include a fractional exhaled nitric oxide test to help determine buy dexamethasone how much lung inflammation is present by measuring nitric oxide levels.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.