Memespace Names and URNs

Supplements xalatan prescription contain antioxidants that may interact with medications doctors prescribe, so bentyl malaysia it is always best to check first before taking them. lumigan sale People must wear sunscreen when using a retinoid product, and find atarax pregnant people should not use retinoids. Other research suggests that cheap buy drug the Phyllanthus species, which Indian gooseberry is part of, may viagra free sample protect the skin from sunlight and UV damage to the buy estradiol valerate online skin's DNA. Scientists have used Indian gooseberry leaves, fruits, and buy clozapine flowers to study their effects on diabetes. However, eating fruit purchase levitra online in large quantities may affect blood sugar, so people with order cheap cialis sale dosage diabetes must consider this and speak with a health practitioner lasix prescription if they are concerned. These toxic chemicals can cause several chronic.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.