Memespace Names and URNs

While order cephalexin from canada these problems diminished over time, the participants' levels of seniority allopurinol sale and professional experience did not put a stop to them. order discount clonidine side effects effects The overall consequence of gender bias in healthcare is that buy pharmacy online people receive worse care than they should, which increases health buy estrace vaginal cream online inequity. Women now make up around half of the participants cialis order in clinical research supported by the National Institutes of Health cost cheapest (NIH). Some found that doctors asked women fewer questions about cheap cipro online their symptoms or prescribed women less medication. And in some zithromax no prescription cases, it might be appropriate to report malpractice stemming from fda approved cialis bias to a state medical licensing board. However, artists who are.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.