Memespace Names and URNs

If buying viagra online the flare-up is so severe that a massage is painful, discount levitra people may need to postpone their appointment until their skin vibramycin sale is less inflamed. They can also look for a licensed cheap buy from canada massage therapist with experience treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, lowest price viagra this article should not be used as a substitute for asacol no prescription the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. When purchase cheap lipitor sale dangers comparing two similar drugs, such as Humira and Remicade, it buy generic cipro isn't possible to know if one drug will be better order generic buy prescription and alcohol or stronger than the other. It will also depend on cialis buy online the cost of the visit to a healthcare professional to cheapest viagra online receive doses of Remicade. Here's a quick look at the dosage.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.