Memespace Names and URNs

Some purchase cialis no rx common causes of sensorineural hearing loss include head injuries, diabetes, free buy online order and noise-induced hearing loss. An audiologist can recommend which device order cheapest buy low cost dosage is more suitable depending on an individual's type of hearing zithromax for order loss. Hearing aids and cochlear implants are medical devices — ventolin online a doctor or audiologist can suggest which product is more buy cheap vibramycin online suitable for an individual's requirements. A person can also customize no online without prescription the devices through the Lively app and use it to cephalexin online contact a Lively audiologist. LEARN MORE This device automatically senses fda approved artane and adapts to every situation using wireless connectivity. Some hearing generic amoxicillin sale information aids are available to buy online, and others are only estrace for sale available through an audiologist. People with constrictive pericarditis may notice swelling.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.