Memespace Names and URNs

Talk buying best with your doctor or pharmacist, who can provide personalized guidance estrace discount buy online info about cost issues related to Sunosi. The drug information contained where to order cialis herein is subject to change and is not intended to cheap pill cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic buy cialis reactions, or adverse effects. Stress may make a person more cost of viagra sensitive to acid reflux symptoms, but more research is necessary generic bentyl to determine the exact link between stress and acid reflux. buy no rx prescription Other side effects may have a causal relationship with CPAP find viagra use, which requires further investigation. Some research suggests CPAP treatment cheapest viagra prices may benefit AFib, while other studies indicate CPAP treatment has no.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.