Memespace Names and URNs

The buy cafergot online Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) are another association that offer order cheapest buy dose ethical guidelines for medical peer reviewers. Peer review helps editors cialis online without a prescription decide whether to reject a paper outright or to ask buy cheap diflucan for various levels of revision before publication. The editorial position cephalexin without a prescription and best practices of the journal influence its criteria for buying cialis online publishing a paper. JAMA, for example, outline the qualities that generic petcam (metacam) oral suspension their medical editors evaluate before sending papers to peer reviewers. buy aldactone from us For example, some conservative doctors, who prefer traditional methods, might glucophage sale reject a more innovative report, even if it is scientifically buy professional sound. Before starting the procedure, most donors will need to discount clozapine take medication that stops their normal menstrual cycle. Throughout the donation.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.