Memespace Names and URNs

While order nasonex in us gas stoves do release harmful substances that can irritate the glyburide generic order lungs and airways, sensitivity to gas stove emissions varies for purchase vibramycin online different people. If anyone has any concerns about asthma risk compare prices prices due to gas stove emissions, they should contact their doctor. generic buy no prescription jelly People may need to use this exclusively for their drinking order generic no prescription water while in some parts of the world and avoid spiriva online stores swallowing any water from faucets. Travel can be beneficial to generic lipitor a person's well-being, but it can also require precautions that discount diovan help people stay healthy while in new places. In many compare cialis prices online places in the U.S., tree pollination begins in early spring compare prescription prices online or sometimes earlier if the winter was mild. For this lasix for order reason, states such as Florida, Louisiana, and Texas may be challenging.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.