Memespace Names and URNs

If buy cheap robaxin witch hazel causes a skin reaction, people should see a retin-a for order doctor, particularly if they experience severe symptoms that do not buy clomid pills improve with home remedies, such as a cool compress. Melanoma get cheap buy online effects is a type of skin cancer that occurs when the t-ject 60 without prescription cells that give the skin its color (melanocytes) grow out generic glyburide online of control. Wide excision of the primary tumor is a buy generic triamterene fairly minor operation that may be suitable for most thin discount buy no rx melanomas. A person's doctor can advise on ways to reduce cheap buy online the risks of long-term side effects and how to manage discount viagra online any that develop. According to the American Massage Therapy Association, compare (metacam) prices massage therapy is a stress-management technique that may help with cheap cialis no prescription psoriasis symptoms. Those with psoriatic arthritis also need to let their.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.