Memespace Names and URNs

A find cheap (metacam) doctor will need to know a person's medical history, any viagra without a prescription medications they are taking, and any symptoms they are experiencing. prednisolone buy A relative survival rate helps give an idea of how approved cost pharmacy long a person with a particular condition will live after cheap viagra tablet receiving a diagnosis compared with those without the condition. Some buy nasonex without prescription people survive very advanced cancers, while others with early cancers discount viagra online see their cancers metastasize and spread. For example, people who tetracycline without prescription develop severe side effects and whose cancers do not shrink without dexamethasone get prescription discount tend to have a worse prognosis than those who tolerate acomplia online stores treatment well while experiencing improvements in their tumors. Type IA order discount cost online effects means the cancer is only in the stomach tissue, while type.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.