Memespace Names and URNs

People estradiol valerate online stores should contact a doctor if they experience chronically discolored or buy cheap buy online canada thick nails, or nail separation. The condition can lead to prednisolone muscle weakness, particularly in the hips, thighs, shoulders, and upper buy cephalexin without prescription arms. Shared environmental factors and immune system dysregulation may contribute order discount dexamethasone online to the development of both conditions. DM can arise in buy without rx individuals with a higher risk of developing cancer, including small cheap (metacam) price dangers cell lung cancer (SCLC). To diagnose liver disease, doctors may cheap (metacam) on internet use liver function tests to check liver enzyme levels and synthroid no prescription any signs of liver damage. Without treatment, asymptomatic liver disease cheap cialis without prescription may progress to more severe, irreversible forms of liver disease, including.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.