Memespace Names and URNs

Some cialis bangkok Jatenzo side effects are similar to those of testosterone cypionate purchase cheapest no rx injection (Depo-Testosterone). Increased blood pressure doesn't cause symptoms, but it buy flovent online can increase your risk of heart attack and stroke. If cheap generic aldactone you've ever had an allergic reaction to Jatenzo or any where to buy cipro of its ingredients, your doctor will likely not prescribe Jatenzo. buy viagra Be sure to tell your doctor right away if you accutane no prescription experience any of the side effects listed in the "Serious drops medicine side effects" section above. The absence of warnings or other diflucan tablets information for a given drug does not indicate that the online flovent drug or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for buying cialis all patients or all specific uses. BMD tests use a T-score.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.