Memespace Names and URNs

This purchase viagra online side effect may be more likely to occur if you store get generic without arcoxia prescription take your first Zubsolv dose while you still have other acomplia online opioids in your system. What you can doBefore you begin generic atrovent sale dangers taking Zubsolv, be sure to tell your doctor and pharmacist drops buy online about all other medications you take. If you've had an discount augmentin allergic reaction to Zubsolv or any of its ingredients, your cialis sales doctor will likely not prescribe Zubsolv. The drug information contained viagra cheap price herein is subject to change and is not intended to cost of mirapex cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic buy norvasc lowest price reactions, or adverse effects. However, further research is necessary to viagra order determine how much green tea a person would need to atrovent from canada drink to receive the full benefits of these polyphenols and whether.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.