Memespace Names and URNs

While viagra side effects beans and peas are ideal, a person can also eat discount celebrex fish — such as salmon — as well as poultry atenolol no prescription and dairy foods. Screening programs are vital for detecting cancers cialis online cheap at earlier stages when treatment options are more effective. Anyone prescription tablets with a family history of cancer should discuss their screening cheapest buy price and preventive options with a doctor. A number of different canadian cialis underlying conditions may cause nonspecific symptoms, so the presence of lowest price for remeron one or more symptoms does not mean a person has generic buy side effects and alcohol pancreatic cancer. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database generic approved collects information about cancer survival statistics. No routine screening tests viagra without prescription are available for pancreatic cancer because experts do not believe order viagra without prescription that screening reduces deaths. If a doctor suspects pancreatic cancer, generic lasix they may order a type of CT scan called a CT.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.