Memespace Names and URNs

While discount cafergot gas stoves do release harmful substances that can irritate the buy cialis in us lungs and airways, sensitivity to gas stove emissions varies for cialis generic different people. If anyone has any concerns about asthma risk purchase ampicillin work due to gas stove emissions, they should contact their doctor. purchase cheap for sale dangers For more information about the possible side effects of Airsupra, viagra in malaysia talk with your doctor or pharmacist. Airsupra usesThe Food and zithromax for sale Drug Administration (FDA) approves prescription drugs such as Airsupra to buy cheap allopurinol online treat certain conditions. However, you should still check with your buy cheap artane online doctor or pharmacist before using any of these products while remeron no prescription taking Airsupra. If you're not sure if you'll need to ampicillin side effects pill get prior authorization for Airsupra, contact your insurance company. Your doctor.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.