Memespace Names and URNs

Potential get buy alternatives store donors and recipients should discuss living donor liver transplant risks nasonex sale with their hospitals. That is why a transplant team can buy discount online leave a portion behind in the donor and place a buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension piece into the recipient. It can take a person off buy betnovate online the lengthy liver transplant waiting list and get them into cheap buy in uk surgery before a life threatening health crisis occurs. The donor viagra online stores and recipient will need to stay in the hospital for buy free clindamycin prescription several days, followed by monitoring by doctors for several weeks. buy cheap glucophage online In DDLT, a surgeon removes the recipient's liver and replaces purchase cheap compazine sale dangers it with a healthy liver from a deceased donor. Once a.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.