Memespace Names and URNs

The buy drug shortcomings of PASI scores are the unreliability and inconsistency that generic kenalog stem from the subjectivity involved in rating symptoms and estimating cheap tizanidine no prescription percentages. They may also use it to establish a baseline gel from canada from which they can monitor the progression of the psoriasis prescription medicine and evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. However, most researchers and buy cheap cephalexin online organizations state that there is not yet enough evidence of arcoxia online the effectiveness of stem cell therapy and knowledge about the order discount cialis side effects effects long-term risks. The National Emphysema Foundation points out that people discount erythromycin who have used unproven stem cell therapies are often willing cialis bangkok to get further infusions, suggesting a positive experience. Clinical trials cheap viagra tablets are controlled experiments in which researchers test a new treatment in.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.