Memespace Names and URNs

There buy amikacin without prescription is evidence to suggest that video games may be a triamterene prescription viable treatment for depression and improve memory and mood in order glucophage adults with mild cognitive impairment. If you're having trouble opening glucophage for sale medication bottles, ask your pharmacist about putting Rinvoq in an sale cialis easy-open container. For example, estrogen withdrawal migraine may respond well buy generic celexa to estrogen therapy or hormonal contraceptives. A heart perfusion imaging buy generic remeron scan can also evaluate the effectiveness of certain cardiac treatments, order mirapex no prescription such as coronary artery stenting or bypass surgery. It concluded order discount lumigan online that fortified dairy products containing added calcium and vitamin D ampicillin for order could positively affect bone mineral density. The authors note that order viagra on internet the reduction achieved in the active supplement group is close to.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.