Memespace Names and URNs

Also, generic estrace vaginal cream staff members provide three meals a day, alongside help with lowest price for buying personal care and rehabilitation. A person with Alzheimer's disease or gel in bangkok another type of dementia receives the same coverage as others tablet atenolol using Medicare. It can affect both men and women as purchase estrace online a result of chafing against clothing or tissue damage from buy cheap triamterene online cuts or blows. Using a spoon, cup, or syringe is buy allopurinol without prescription less likely to have an adverse effect on the baby's cialis no rx required latch and long-term breastfeeding success. Pain associated with breastfeeding is order celexa a common cause of stopping breastfeeding early, according to the buy cheap generic without prescription Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. OB-GYNs provide a wide range of preventive.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.