Memespace Names and URNs

However, buy professional while BCAA supplements are popular, people can get sufficient amounts buy in australia of BCAA from eating high quality protein. It would be find no rx atenolol difficult to list the vast number of effective bodybuilding supplements buy no rx available on the market. Taking too much of a bodybuilding order order online supplement is not likely to increase results, as the body purchase zofran online can only use so much of any given supplement at prozac for order once. Although it may take weeks or months to notice buy generic buy cost professional muscle growth, consistent resistance training, regular sleep, and a healthy approved viagra pharmacy diet should maximize results. However, no supplement will replace the cialis cheap price basics, such as eating a balanced diet and following healthy zithromax online stores lifestyle practices. Occasionally, a person's need for L-arginine may exceed their.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.