Memespace Names and URNs

If diflucan medicine doctors are not certain that an individual received a bite buy cheap acomplia from an animal infected with rabies, they typically must exclude buy buy generic other conditions first. A small number of people have survived buy generic generic rabies, but most cases are fatal once symptoms develop, and viagra in malaysia there is no effective treatment at this stage. For post-exposure griseofulvin prices protection, previously unvaccinated people need four doses of the rabies buy cheapest lumigan vaccine, plus rabies immune globulin (RIG). In recent years, the generic quinine prevalence of rabies in South America and the Caribbean has discount amoxicillin fallen significantly due to rabies control programs. Anyone who has buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension online a bite from a potentially infected animal should receive immediate cheap cialis on internet medical attention and post-exposure vaccinations. In places where hookworm is buy cheap levitra online common, those who are at risk may receive preventive drug treatment.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.