Memespace Names and URNs

There viagra online without a prescription is less research on sexual coercion than other types of cheap order from canada nonconsensual sex, but what exists suggests that it is common purchase buy without prescription and more likely to affect some people than others. Schools, alesse (ovral l) prescription workplaces, and other institutions may classify it as sexual harassment viagra side effects rather than assault and have their own rules for managing gel internet it. If a person is unsure if they have experienced order discount betnovate sexual coercion, assault, or abuse, they may wish to speak discount ampicillin with a helpline, support worker, or lawyer specializing in this order advair from canada area. However, the term "skin bleaching" usually refers to overall zyprexa prescription skin lightening, which is not something dermatologists support. This shows no alternative how the negative messages people hear about skin tone can substantially.

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.