Memespace Names and URNs

Why cheap azor no rx are costs different for biologic drugs vs. biosimilar drugs?Biologic drugs discount methotrexate can be expensive because of the research needed to test buy without prescription their safety and effectiveness. Based on whether you have insurance remeron sale through a private company or the government — or whether discount medication you plan to pay out of pocket — it will where to buy buy refer you to the best place to get the Shingrix zithromax vaccine for the lowest cost. However, if you have health levitra for order insurance, you'll need to talk with your insurance provider to order nasonex cheap online learn the actual cost you would pay for Shingrix. The cialis non prescription absence of warnings or other information for a given drug purchase generic online does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is in prices safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific uses..

Ron Daniel writes on the TaxoCop list that “managing memespaces
sounds like managing URN namespaces. You might want to see what
the IETF defined for URNs, see which parts of it make sense, and
also see if you can figure out what special value you will offer
that will tempt people into supporting and using memespace names
when they have pretty much ignored URNs.”

Ron is right that URNs have been ignored. Only 25 URNs have been registered, probably because of the laborious RFC process needed for each one.

Some of them are organization names, suitable for proper memespaces (like OASIS and IETF). Others are more properly used as taxospace names (like ISBN and ISSN).

Memography’s Memespace Registry will offer a much simpler procedure for registering memespace and taxospace names.

And of course the value is memetic search.

Comments are closed.