An
cheapest cialis example of recall bias is the difference between asking study
discount generic order participants to recall the weather at the time of the
buy generic buy online onset of a certain symptom, versus an analysis of scientifically
buying diclofenac online measured weather patterns around the time of a formal diagnosis.
viagra cheap drug There are, though, questions that can be used to test
buy diflucan cheap the likelihood of a causal relationship, such as the extent
cheap accutane of the association or whether there is a ‘dose response'
buy vendors to increasing exposure to the risk factor. An example of
viagra no rx this occurs when cases are seen in a teaching hospital,
discount alesse (ovral l) a highly specialized setting compared with most settings in which the.
In today’s Bloug, Lou says we should introduce the memetic web concept to search vendors. That will be our next step.
He cleverly notes that they could tap into the memespaces by recognizing an area code (or some other existing taxonomy like ISBN) and then prepending the memespace identifier, when they know it.
Our simple proposal for ISBN is just MEMOISBN-0596000359. This is the meme ID for the Polar Bear book (Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, by Lou and Peter).
See the memespaces page for others.
Search engines will also be key players in the control of meme ID spamming.
Any good contacts to recommend at Google et al.?
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, November 8th, 2005 at 10:34 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Edit this entry.
November 14th, 2005 at 1:01 am e
If a search engine could reliably recognise (say) an ISBN, why would it need the memespace prefix at all? Could it not just recognise a probable ISBN in the query, and then search its index of ISBNs it’s previously recognised on pages?
November 14th, 2005 at 11:53 am e
Matthew,
The presence of an ISBN on a page does not mean the page is “about” the book, only that the book is mentioned there.
Right?