Lou Rosenfeld’s Bloug

Research cheapest cheap price has found that combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy can improve amoxicillin sale the survival rate in people with metastatic RCC. The researchers 60 in uk suggested that benefits from empagliflozin may be partly due to cheapest celebrex lower adenine levels. Whereas low levels of adenine were present buy cheap lasix in healthy kidneys, they noted that adenine levels were elevated cialis in australia in certain areas of kidneys with diabetes, such as scarred generic buy side effects and alcohol blood vessels. Donald A. Molony Dr. Molony noted that the discount nexium study serves as evidence to introduce adenine-lowering drugs or other buy cheapest buy online kidney protective interventions early on in treatment "that might otherwise (metacam) tablet not be considered until [excess protein occurs in the urine] acomplia lowest uk cost get cheapest or there is a rise in blood creatinine." Jared Braunstein, board.

In today’s Bloug, Lou says we should introduce the memetic web concept to search vendors. That will be our next step.

He cleverly notes that they could tap into the memespaces by recognizing an area code (or some other existing taxonomy like ISBN) and then prepending the memespace identifier, when they know it.

Our simple proposal for ISBN is just MEMOISBN-0596000359. This is the meme ID for the Polar Bear book (Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, by Lou and Peter).

See the memespaces page for others.

Search engines will also be key players in the control of meme ID spamming.

Any good contacts to recommend at Google et al.?

2 Responses to “Lou Rosenfeld’s Bloug”

  1. matthew smillie Says:

    If a search engine could reliably recognise (say) an ISBN, why would it need the memespace prefix at all? Could it not just recognise a probable ISBN in the query, and then search its index of ISBNs it’s previously recognised on pages?

  2. Administrator Says:

    Matthew,

    The presence of an ISBN on a page does not mean the page is “about” the book, only that the book is mentioned there.

    Right?