Lou Rosenfeld’s Bloug

Physical compare cream prices therapyPhysical therapy can help people with moderate hunching due to purchase aldactone online kyphosis, scoliosis, and trauma recovery following surgery. However, slipping back asacol purchase into poor posture can be easy, especially for those who purchase generic buy prescription delivery work at a desk or lift heavy objects all day. buying cheap buy alternatives professional Sciatica arises from damage or pressure on the sciatic nerve, pyrantel pamoate for sale which runs through the leg to the lower back. However, discount zoloft over time and with treatment, individuals may find they can cheap allopurinol online do these exercises again without pain. Next, the person lowers buy cheap bentyl the torso so that their hand touches the inside of buy cialis overnight delivery the front foot, resting either on the ground or on purchase buy online a block. After lowering as much as is comfortable, the individual.

In today’s Bloug, Lou says we should introduce the memetic web concept to search vendors. That will be our next step.

He cleverly notes that they could tap into the memespaces by recognizing an area code (or some other existing taxonomy like ISBN) and then prepending the memespace identifier, when they know it.

Our simple proposal for ISBN is just MEMOISBN-0596000359. This is the meme ID for the Polar Bear book (Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, by Lou and Peter).

See the memespaces page for others.

Search engines will also be key players in the control of meme ID spamming.

Any good contacts to recommend at Google et al.?

2 Responses to “Lou Rosenfeld’s Bloug”

  1. matthew smillie Says:

    If a search engine could reliably recognise (say) an ISBN, why would it need the memespace prefix at all? Could it not just recognise a probable ISBN in the query, and then search its index of ISBNs it’s previously recognised on pages?

  2. Administrator Says:

    Matthew,

    The presence of an ISBN on a page does not mean the page is “about” the book, only that the book is mentioned there.

    Right?