Relevence of Misspellings

Following buy cheap ventolin the recommendations of the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans could order no rx viagra help reduce a person's risk of death and cardiovascular disease. atarax pharmacy If you're interested in bodybuilding, talk with your doctor about buy tizanidine ways to safely achieve your goals. Treatments made with botulinum purchase cheap vibramycin low cost consultation toxin are sold under the brand names Botox Cosmetic, Dysport, prednisolone no prescription and Xeomin. For example, stress can make existing LUTS worse, buy cheap prednisolone and there are many aspects of living through a pandemic best price allopurinol that might cause stress. As long as there are no retin-a no rx required severe preeclampsia symptoms present, a person's OB-GYN may treat and discount flagyl side effects usa manage them as an outpatient rather than admit them to best price cialis the hospital. For more information about the potential negative effects buy cheap zoloft of Jesduvroq, see the "Jesduvroq side effects" section above. A cheapest atarax person's palliative care team may consist of specialist doctors and generic griseofulvin nurses, nutritionists, social workers, mental health professionals, and chaplains. Though the.

We’ve all noticed how Google will fix our misspellings, with their synonyms list suggesting the more likely search term - Did you mean Relevance?

When the misspelling is so bad it’s not in Google’s synonym rings, we have entered the huge space of random strings that are not in use anywhere (that is the future home for our meme IDs).

Companies have long tried to find misspellings that could become new brands, and the limited lexical space of domains has increased the pressure to misspell. Flickr is perhaps the best known Folksonomy site.

Peter Morville told us that Ross Mayfield of SocialText coined the misspelling indicatr to tag photos of corporate parking lots (a diagnostic tool to detect periods of intense R&D at the company).

And RSA Security, encryption and digital signature specialists, have an authentication product they call securID (nice play on security). At Jakob Nielsen’s User Expreince 2005 conference, Peter Morville pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra “e”), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

The amazing thing is Google’s synonym list, apparently with the preferred term being rated by their PageRank® algorithms. They ask - Did you mean SecurID? As Peter said, Google knows more about RSA’s business than RSA’s own search engine does.

3 Responses to “Relevence of Misspellings”

  1. Jared Spool Says:

    At his User Interface 10 conference, Jared Spool pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra ā€œeā€), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

    This is a cool example, however I can’t take attribution for it. Gerry McGovern, perhaps?

  2. Peter Morville Says:

    Hey, that’s my example :-)

  3. Administrator Says:

    Peter,

    Ross Mayfield’s indicatr and RSA SecurID are both your examples.

    My head was so full of all the events from Jared’s UI10 and Jakob Nielsen’s UX 2005 that I scrambled who taught me what.

    Thanks very much for everything.

    Bob Doyle