Relevence of Misspellings

People cheap pyrantel pamoate who have an early onset of ASPD may be more 60 online review likely to become involved in illegal or criminal behavior. People low cost for with this condition typically present impulsive and irresponsible behavior and discount flagyl may seem unconcerned about other people's safety. A person may buy cheap lipitor display behavior that appears manipulative, irresponsible, reckless, and impulsive, though generic clozapine sale dangers it is important to remember that this is a personality order 60 lowest dosage cheapest price disorder. Doctors can help people with ASPD treat their symptoms for pill and manage their impulsivity and aggression, reducing their risk of purchase flovent online putting themselves or other people in danger. Doctors have noticed purchase cheapest cheapest no prescription tablets that ASPD can also co-occur alongside other mental health conditions, buy generic lumigan such as depression and anxiety, substance use disorder, and bipolar buy buy no rx disorder, suggesting genetics is an important factor in the development buy free advair prescription of ASPD. The treatment for ASPD typically includes a combination of.

We’ve all noticed how Google will fix our misspellings, with their synonyms list suggesting the more likely search term - Did you mean Relevance?

When the misspelling is so bad it’s not in Google’s synonym rings, we have entered the huge space of random strings that are not in use anywhere (that is the future home for our meme IDs).

Companies have long tried to find misspellings that could become new brands, and the limited lexical space of domains has increased the pressure to misspell. Flickr is perhaps the best known Folksonomy site.

Peter Morville told us that Ross Mayfield of SocialText coined the misspelling indicatr to tag photos of corporate parking lots (a diagnostic tool to detect periods of intense R&D at the company).

And RSA Security, encryption and digital signature specialists, have an authentication product they call securID (nice play on security). At Jakob Nielsen’s User Expreince 2005 conference, Peter Morville pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra “e”), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

The amazing thing is Google’s synonym list, apparently with the preferred term being rated by their PageRank® algorithms. They ask - Did you mean SecurID? As Peter said, Google knows more about RSA’s business than RSA’s own search engine does.

3 Responses to “Relevence of Misspellings”

  1. Jared Spool Says:

    At his User Interface 10 conference, Jared Spool pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra ā€œeā€), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

    This is a cool example, however I can’t take attribution for it. Gerry McGovern, perhaps?

  2. Peter Morville Says:

    Hey, that’s my example :-)

  3. Administrator Says:

    Peter,

    Ross Mayfield’s indicatr and RSA SecurID are both your examples.

    My head was so full of all the events from Jared’s UI10 and Jakob Nielsen’s UX 2005 that I scrambled who taught me what.

    Thanks very much for everything.

    Bob Doyle