Relevence of Misspellings

To buy generic griseofulvin establish that the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, robaxin prescription we:.We do the research so you can find trusted products azor prescription for your health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. clonidine free sample Before using Modern Fertility in a person's fertility journey, they low price asacol may wish to consider the following advantages and disadvantages. Ro cheap cialis pill states this test is suitable for all females regardless of zofran no prescription cycle length, as the test screens for LH concentrations above buy celexa pills a certain amount. Ro claims that the capsules are easy buy azor generic to digest, which may appeal to people who are pregnant viagra online without a prescription and experiencing morning sickness. Once a person subscribes to this allopurinol in uk service, the company will deliver the birth control in discreet buy no rx clozapine packaging within two days. According to customer reviews, the side purchase cafergot online effects of Modern Fertility prenatal multivitamins are a fishy taste. buy cheap lipitor During pregnancy, the cervix also becomes firmer and stronger, which cheap allopurinol no prescription helps to protect the fetus until birth. It is important to.

We’ve all noticed how Google will fix our misspellings, with their synonyms list suggesting the more likely search term - Did you mean Relevance?

When the misspelling is so bad it’s not in Google’s synonym rings, we have entered the huge space of random strings that are not in use anywhere (that is the future home for our meme IDs).

Companies have long tried to find misspellings that could become new brands, and the limited lexical space of domains has increased the pressure to misspell. Flickr is perhaps the best known Folksonomy site.

Peter Morville told us that Ross Mayfield of SocialText coined the misspelling indicatr to tag photos of corporate parking lots (a diagnostic tool to detect periods of intense R&D at the company).

And RSA Security, encryption and digital signature specialists, have an authentication product they call securID (nice play on security). At Jakob Nielsen’s User Expreince 2005 conference, Peter Morville pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra “e”), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

The amazing thing is Google’s synonym list, apparently with the preferred term being rated by their PageRank® algorithms. They ask - Did you mean SecurID? As Peter said, Google knows more about RSA’s business than RSA’s own search engine does.

3 Responses to “Relevence of Misspellings”

  1. Jared Spool Says:

    At his User Interface 10 conference, Jared Spool pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra ā€œeā€), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

    This is a cool example, however I can’t take attribution for it. Gerry McGovern, perhaps?

  2. Peter Morville Says:

    Hey, that’s my example :-)

  3. Administrator Says:

    Peter,

    Ross Mayfield’s indicatr and RSA SecurID are both your examples.

    My head was so full of all the events from Jared’s UI10 and Jakob Nielsen’s UX 2005 that I scrambled who taught me what.

    Thanks very much for everything.

    Bob Doyle