Scopolamine buy generic prednisolone is a medication that may help with drooling, and the order buy no rx body can absorb it through a patch on the skin. alesse (ovral l) for order Brain scans may reveal various conditions that could be the generic cipro online cause of a person's symptoms, such as tumors or strokes. buy clonidine A PET scan may be appropriate if the results of diclofenac no rx an MRI or CT scan are uncertain or if a buy nexium doctor requires information on changes in the brain's blood flow. side effects purchase cost cheap According to both the ALS Association and the Centers for celexa bangkok Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the exact rate of ALS where to order cialis is difficult to determine. One person may live with mild symptoms.

We’ve all noticed how Google will fix our misspellings, with their synonyms list suggesting the more likely search term - Did you mean Relevance?

When the misspelling is so bad it’s not in Google’s synonym rings, we have entered the huge space of random strings that are not in use anywhere (that is the future home for our meme IDs).

Companies have long tried to find misspellings that could become new brands, and the limited lexical space of domains has increased the pressure to misspell. Flickr is perhaps the best known Folksonomy site.

Peter Morville told us that Ross Mayfield of SocialText coined the misspelling indicatr to tag photos of corporate parking lots (a diagnostic tool to detect periods of intense R&D at the company).

And RSA Security, encryption and digital signature specialists, have an authentication product they call securID (nice play on security). At Jakob Nielsen’s User Expreince 2005 conference, Peter Morville pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra “e”), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

The amazing thing is Google’s synonym list, apparently with the preferred term being rated by their PageRank® algorithms. They ask - Did you mean SecurID? As Peter said, Google knows more about RSA’s business than RSA’s own search engine does.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 14th, 2005 at 1:17 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. Edit this entry.