Relevence of Misspellings

Evidence where to order for states that these ingredients may produce gastrointestinal symptoms in some buy cheap norvasc online people, such as diarrhea and flatulence (gas in the intestines). cheapest buy price However, it states that since people use them for cavity order cialis no prescription prevention for a shorter duration, they would not have such estradiol sale free pharmacy effects. This indicates that the gum has met requirements for cheapest generic online safety and effectiveness at providing at least one benefit for discount compazine overnight delivery the teeth and gums. Certain varieties of chewing gum containing buy cheap drug sugar can lead to cavities, and others containing sugar alcohols betnovate bangkok may cause gastrointestinal symptoms. Eating disorders can severely affect the atrovent for sale quality of life of people living with these conditions and cheapest prozac those close to them. Speaking with a dentist can also cost of cialis help a person learn how to protect their teeth from further.

We’ve all noticed how Google will fix our misspellings, with their synonyms list suggesting the more likely search term - Did you mean Relevance?

When the misspelling is so bad it’s not in Google’s synonym rings, we have entered the huge space of random strings that are not in use anywhere (that is the future home for our meme IDs).

Companies have long tried to find misspellings that could become new brands, and the limited lexical space of domains has increased the pressure to misspell. Flickr is perhaps the best known Folksonomy site.

Peter Morville told us that Ross Mayfield of SocialText coined the misspelling indicatr to tag photos of corporate parking lots (a diagnostic tool to detect periods of intense R&D at the company).

And RSA Security, encryption and digital signature specialists, have an authentication product they call securID (nice play on security). At Jakob Nielsen’s User Expreince 2005 conference, Peter Morville pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra “e”), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

The amazing thing is Google’s synonym list, apparently with the preferred term being rated by their PageRank® algorithms. They ask - Did you mean SecurID? As Peter said, Google knows more about RSA’s business than RSA’s own search engine does.

3 Responses to “Relevence of Misspellings”

  1. Jared Spool Says:

    At his User Interface 10 conference, Jared Spool pointed out that if you search the RSA site for secureID (note the extra ā€œeā€), hardly any results come back. When you misspell it correctly, hundreds of pages are found.

    This is a cool example, however I can’t take attribution for it. Gerry McGovern, perhaps?

  2. Peter Morville Says:

    Hey, that’s my example :-)

  3. Administrator Says:

    Peter,

    Ross Mayfield’s indicatr and RSA SecurID are both your examples.

    My head was so full of all the events from Jared’s UI10 and Jakob Nielsen’s UX 2005 that I scrambled who taught me what.

    Thanks very much for everything.

    Bob Doyle