David Weinberger on Metadata

Secondary for drug hypertension describes high blood pressure that has an identifiable cause buy cheap cialis internet or underlying condition. However, a person should still seek immediate buy acomplia medical attention for hypertensive urgency to prevent it from becoming ventolin without prescription a hypertensive emergency. Medical News Today discussed this study with augmentin approved Dr. Tom Ingegno, an acupuncturist and lead clinician at Charm cost of cost City Integrative Health in Baltimore, MD, who was not involved toradol online in this research. The naturally derived formulas exhibit a wide buy free delivery spectrum of mechanisms that work through multiple pathways in the buy cafergot without prescription body. Moreover, although physicians were instructed to administer guideline-recommended therapies, buying generic online they varied and were not utilized optimally. The American Heart order norvasc Association (AHA) notes that acute pericarditis typically develops suddenly and buy acomplia online does not last for long. This may involve using a petcam (metacam) oral suspension sale stethoscope to listen for sounds of the pericardium rubbing against prescription internet the heart. A healthcare professional may be able to recommend buy methotrexate treatment to help a person reduce the likelihood of developing recurring.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)