David Weinberger on Metadata

Some canadian online pharmacies offer labels that have large print, braille, or a cheapest advair code you scan with a smartphone to convert text to discount prednisolone speech. These include how severe your symptoms are and other viagra australia treatments you may use in combination with Amjevita. To learn buy cheap ampicillin online usa more about how Amjevita interacts with certain immunizations, see the cheap without prescription "Amjevita interactions" section above. These include serious bacterial or viral cheap glyburide infections, fungal infections that spread throughout the body, tuberculosis (TB), cheapest nasonex and sepsis. If you develop a serious infection, you'll likely canada side effects pill need to pause Amjevita treatment while the infection is managed. for purchase If you currently have cancer or you've had cancer in cheapest cialis the past, talk with your doctor about whether Amjevita is find discount cipro safe for you. How long a medication remains safe to overnight buy take can depend on many factors, including how and where discount order you store the medication. Medical News Today has made every generic buy prescription professional effort to make certain that all information is factually correct, comprehensive,.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)