David Weinberger on Metadata

Choosing purchase viagra online a single product can feel overwhelming, given the wide range buy generic betnovate of products the company offers on its website. If a find no rx nasonex person with kidney failure also experiences heart disease, doctors may viagra order prescribe statins to manage cholesterol levels and treat the heart buy ventolin online condition. Some stores also sell lactose-reduced milk, which may be cialis tablet suitable for people who can safely consume small amounts of buy cheap synthroid online lactose. A low salicylate diet might have a positive effect bentyl on reducing symptoms in some people with salicylate sensitivity. Medical lasix online professionals tend to treat depression with psychotherapy, medication, or a zithromax generic combination of both. Avoiding all dairy products is the only diflucan purchase low free price way for people with lactose intolerance to prevent symptoms. Dr. cheapest diovan David Merrill, a geriatric psychiatrist and director of the Pacific estrace online Neuroscience Institute's Pacific Brain Health Center in Santa Monica, California, atrovent sale who was not involved in the current research, spoke with order cheapest retin-a no prescription consultation Medical News Today about the study. To check blood pressure at.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)