David Weinberger on Metadata

If cialis online without a prescription a drug requires prior authorization but you start treatment without buy diovan online the prior approval, you could pay the full cost of cheapest vibramycin the medication. To find out how much you'll pay for artane cheapest price Symtuza versus Biktarvy or Tivicay, talk with your doctor, pharmacist, viagra overnight delivery or insurance provider. Also, because generics contain the same active purchase free buy low price australia ingredients as brand-name drugs, they don't require the same costly cheapest remeron testing. But if you have health insurance, you'll need to buy discount for sale jelly talk with your insurance provider to learn the actual cost buy free drops you would pay for Symtuza. The absence of warnings or buying viagra other information for a given drug does not indicate that where to order prescription the drug or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate compare buy prices online for all patients or all specific uses. Functional and structural atarax online stores changes in areas of the brain, such as the ventral buy buy internet striatum and medial thalamus, may cause apathy. Cocaine may increase buy cheap lipitor the speed some people can do straightforward physical or mental tasks,.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)