David Weinberger on Metadata

However, zithromax prescription the review's authors state that more research is necessary to buy cheap accutane determine a link between PsA and lymphomas. However, it is discount buy online important to note that current research has not found that get cheap clindamycin best price tablet people with PsA are at higher risk for developing lymphomas. order estrace However, people may develop both conditions simultaneously, and in rare cheap augmentin no rx cases, someone might develop PsA first. If fasting as a price of acomplia weight loss method causes someone to become underweight, their risk cheapest generic erythromycin of developing tinnitus may increase. Although there may be a buy metronidazole gel without prescription connection between diet and tinnitus, dietary changes are not currently flagyl a first-line treatment option for people with tinnitus. Although it prescription no online prescription can be asymptomatic for many years, long-term and untreated HBP atrovent sale can lead to serious health problems, including kidney disease and buy advair heart failure. Researchers said the results showed a strong linear kenalog online association between moderate to vigorous physical activity and obesity prevention cialis buy drug in the morning group, whereas a weaker connection was found in.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)