The buy cheap colchicine absence of warnings or other information for a given drug celexa online sales does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is xalatan no online prescription safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific purchase lumigan overnight delivery uses. However, further studies are necessary, and a person should cheap compazine tablet not take any dietary supplements without first speaking with a free viagra doctor. Using this type of service may help lower the order asacol on internet drug's cost and allow you to receive your medication without cheap prescription without consultation bentyl order leaving home. Probiotics are safe for most people, but according viagra in uk to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, they buy cipro pills may pose a risk for those with certain conditions such find no rx vibramycin as a weakened immune system. Individuals with limited income and buy generic clozapine cost work resources may qualify for Extra Help, a program that helps estradiol valerate online stores pay Part D costs for eligible individuals. A medical professional buy advair online can order tests and provide treatment if they show either buy aldactone in canada an active or inactive TB infection. Depression, on the other hand,.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 17th, 2005 at 2:48 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. Edit this entry.