David Weinberger on Metadata

This order zoloft is because small blood clots, which are more common to amikacin no prescription develop with untreated AFib, can block small arteries feeding oxygen atarax tablet to the brain, depriving the brain of oxygen and then canadian cialis [causing] the subsequent death of that tissue." Moles may be zoloft online slightly raised or flat, but the mole's border is usually best price cialis distinct from the surrounding skin. People with hepatorenal syndrome typically generic prozac also have portal hypertension, which is high blood pressure in viagra side effects the vein that carries blood to the liver. Yoga aims generic estrace vaginal cream to support the body's joints, muscles, structure, and function while levitra information calming the mind at the same time. There are no buy generic zyprexa cost work studies that confirm the effectiveness and safety of CBD products buy viagra pills in the treatment of ED. In some cases, they may generic betnovate prescription professional recommend either radiation therapy alone or chemotherapy and radiation therapy generic betnovate with surgery following. Once a person develops a shingles rash, buy quinine cheapest alternatives india they can pass VZV to anyone who has not had a.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)