David Weinberger on Metadata

This buy cheap griseofulvin online drug may not be the right treatment for you if order discount buy side effects effects you have certain medical conditions or other factors that affect get prescription alternatives store your health. If you're pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning for either, flagyl prescription talk with your doctor before you start taking Tavneos. The atenolol internet drug information contained herein is subject to change and is atarax sale not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, order cheapest augmentin low cost dosage drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. Making modifications to generic estrace diet and lifestyle may help a person lower their blood buy discount online sale jelly pressure and reduce their risk of complications from hypertension. It order cheap bangkok sale dosage can damage essential organs and cause severe complications, such as online cheap heart attack, stroke, and loss of kidney function. One-year endpoints arcoxia online included MACCE, hospitalization due to heart failure, in-stent thrombosis, major cheap amoxicillin bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Traditional medicines, often made up of gentamicin eye drops online stores plant and/or insect components, have garnered reputations for enhancing health over.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)