David Weinberger on Metadata

Opioid buy cheapest no effects on the brain can reduce the perception of pain, discount buy which is why doctors prescribe some opioids for pain relief. buy online without a prescription BRAF-positive lung cancer is rare, but it is more common online pharmacy cialis in some groups, including women and people who have never buy cheapest low cost pharmacy smoked. In general, NSCLC treatment depends on how far the buy diflucan cancer has progressed and a person's overall health. Early detection diovan is critical to a person's health and long-term survival, so t-ject 60 for sale people who have any cancer symptoms should speak with a compare discount prices doctor as quickly as possible. If a person is symptomatic buy generic clonidine and has a large amount of virus in their system, buy cheap clomid an antigen test is typically very accurate. For a PCR buy discount prescription test, a person must amplify the genetic material in a purchase cheapest augmentin online sample, which allows the test to detect even a small buy discount cheap sale jelly amount of the virus. However, they may not be as find discount no online accurate as PCR tests, especially in the beginning stages of a.

“Crunching the Metadata” is an article in the November 13 Boston Globe that describes the need for new - and unique - identifiers that we can use to tag books of the future (and of course the entire contents of the web). Is he thinking of meme IDs?

David says ” we’ll need two things.”

“First, we’ll need what are known as unique identifiers-such as the call letters stamped on the spines of library books. ”

“Second, we’re going to need massive collections of metadata about each book. Some of this metadata will come from the publishers. But much of it will come from users…”

David seems to agree with our theme that “we all are librarians now” when he says “Using metadata to assemble ideas and content from multiple sources, online readers become not passive recipients of bound ideas but active librarians, reviewers, anthologists, editors, commentators, even (re)publishers.”

David Bigwood (on his Catalogablog) says that Weinberger confuses classification with identification. Bigwood realizes multiple meme IDs will be needed to tag content fully.

One Response to “David Weinberger on Metadata”

  1. sean coon Says:

    yes, we’re all librarians. or… we’re all participating in our democracy. either way, times are a changin’ ;-)